Australia to rent nuclear submarines from US as it waits for new ones

Australia poised to rent nuclear submarines in just a few years while it waits up to two decades for new fleet to be built with help from Britain and the US

  • Australia in AUKUS security pact which includes building nuclear submarines
  • Defence minister said government would consider leasing subs in the interim
  • They will build nuclear submarines, which not be ready until the late 2030s
  • France recalled its ambassador after Australia walked away from diesel sub deal
  • Peter Dutton defends decision and said Australia had to act in national interests

The Australian government is prepared to lease nuclear submarines from the US while its own fleet is being built, Defence Minister Peter Dutton says.

Last week, Australia entered into a surprise regional security pact with the US and the UK, known as AUKUS, which includes building US nuclear submarines but these will not be ready until the late 2030s.

Asked on Sky News’ Sunday Agenda program whether the government would consider leasing nuclear submarines in the interim, Mr Dutton said: ‘The short answer is yes’.

‘There is all of that discussion to take place in the next 12 to 18 months,’ he said.

Defence minister Peter Dutton (pictured) has confirmed the government will consider leasing nuclear submarines while new ones are built

‘The talk that you can just buy a nuclear-powered submarine off the shelf, of course, is just not accurate or correct.’

He said the Chinese are pumping out submarines, frigates and aircraft carriers at a record rate and so the rest of the world has stepped up its own production.

‘That unfortunately is the dynamic we are operating in at the moment,’ he said.

However, Australia’s decision has caused a stir in the region, and backlash from the French.

The scrapping of the $90 billion diesel submarine deal between Australia and France has prompted the European nation to recall its Australian ambassador.

Mr Dutton understands why the French are upset, but said the government had to act in Australia’s national interest.

‘Given the changing circumstances in the Indo-Pacific, not just now but over the coming years, we had to make a decision that was in our national interest, and that’s exactly what we have done,’ he said.

But he said suggestions that concerns over the French model had not been flagged by the Australian government, ‘just defy frankly what is on the public record and certainly what was said publicly over a long period of time’.

If Australia had chosen a French nuclear model, it would have involved setting up a nuclear industry in Australia as they need to be refuelled every seven to 10 years.

Australia has entered a security pact with the US and UK which includes building nuclear submarines (pictured)

The technology used by Britain and the US means the reactor does not need to be refuelled for the life of the submarine – about 35 years.

‘Therefore, we don’t need a domestic industry around nuclear,’ Mr Dutton said.

‘That is a game changer for the Labor party and we wanted to make sure that this was a bi-partisan effort.’

While Labor backs the government’s decision, one of its frontbenchers, Ed Husic, said it is typical of the coalition that as soon as events start to unravel, they try to shift responsibility to someone else.

‘They never accept responsibility,’ Mr Husic said.

Australia will acquire at least eight nuclear-powered submarines and a host of other advanced military technology from the UK and US after singing an historic deal aimed at countering China’s growing power

Source: Read Full Article